Thursday, July 24, 2008

Can I Put Ice On Infection On Knee



back here in the Zen version of Elvira. You'll never understand nothing?
Well, it stuck my body zen. Cosmic justice. Yes sir. Before
and that this will become a go and come from "they, Kate is a bad mother," clarify the situation.
"This is a blog which follows the law. (Guys do not laugh, I see you), here is not defame, stoned or persons against whom there is no open cases. Different is that we find the evidence to show cause ..... but that's another chapter
- As current legislation is also freedom of thought, consider what good we want to.
- As freedom of thought is a right recognized by the English Constitution, and this is a blog that follows the law, what they think of me I think it's great anyway.
A less understood even now?
Great, so good.
For this case, you have to fight a little brain before, excuse my pun, but if we play with games of 17 DNA markers and 3 potential donors, we're going to need a little mental exercise.
REPEAT: PROCEDURES theorized, based on the true fact of a case in which police conducted forensic tests. Without presupposing, in any blame. (Do not laugh, jolin)
now seriously I love THIS EVENT

And not because of its complexity, but quite the opposite. The case is clean, elegant simplicity, and consistency Music a Chopin Nocturne. Seriously. While not believe it.
is so neat, clean, basic and logical, that the human mind has succeeded in distorting it to create an unsolvable maze.
unsolvable? No, no way.
What happened then? That
Cartesian logic of role models, clash with the lines of legal thought that handle the judges. This case can not be resolved from a judicial tri
a fact that leads to another. For that we must understand and know well the mechanisms of justice., And I promise I'll try to explain it I already told
somewhere before a case is divided into several parts,
"The fact
-
The categorization of crime-detection of suspicious
"The documentation of the charges against the suspect
" The trial
Portuguese justice is even more complex, because it is more guarantees. The figure of argued, requires the identification of the suspect in order to investigate. And in an international procedure without correspondence between the figure of the plot and the formal suspect, things get complicated even more, because no cause-effect relation-chance, but with the suspect, or the English justice, or the English, accepted requests
cooperation Absurd, I know.
The Madeleine case is in the next step.
Done: Disappearance of Madeleine McCann on the 3rd of May 2007.
Categorization of offense: Amaral was categorized as death, saying parents argued the girl. From that moment, the absurd investigation mechanism, if a judge has to approve something in English soil, or you argued documents the relationship of the time, ability, opportunity, etc, or the answer is NO
Detection suspect, in other countries, the suspect is an internal set of research and until someone is charged, does not know this investigation, the mechanism in the absence of Portuguese international figure, but this judicialized from the first time, the capacity of international cooperation, is null in any case. Documentation
charges against the suspect, as explained before, is impossible from the moment that the requirements for registering argued are inconsistent with the statement of a suspect in other countries
Where does this leave us?
In a statement there to argue, and an investigation has not been able to conclude from step 3. However, the FACT remains, Madeleine is still missing .. NO? Well
around

0 comments:

Post a Comment